Let\u2019s dive right in!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Relying on a pricing strategy helps you stay competitive and aligned with customer needs.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Cost-plus, competitive, and value-based pricing are the most widely used models.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Choosing the right strategy for you largely depends on your industry, business goals, and type of product\/service.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Pricing should be revisited periodically, testing the changes before any radical moves.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Simple and transparent pricing drives conversion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
What are pricing strategies?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Pricing strategies are different approaches a business uses to decide how much to charge for their product or service<\/strong>. In doing so, a business must consider their strategic marketing plan<\/a> and the ongoing market situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In practice, a pricing strategy helps you answer questions like:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- What is the real value we\u2019re offering?<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- How does our price compare to competitors?<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Should we launch high or low?<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- When should we adjust?<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Instead of guessing or going with what \u201cfeels right,\u201d it\u2019s crucial to pick a strategy that ensures you can grow revenue and stay competitive while communicating your product\u2019s value effectively<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Top 7 pricing strategies (with examples)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s a broad range of pricing tactics to consider. While each one has its strengths, some tend to show up more often in the real world because they\u2019re practical and easy to implement across different industries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, here are 7 common pricing strategies you should know about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
#1 Cost-plus pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Cost-plus pricing (also known as cost-based or markup pricing<\/strong>) is one of the most widely used strategies, as it follows this simple formula:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Total Cost + Markup = Price<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Your total cost is the sum of direct costs (materials, manufacturing, labor) and indirect costs (rent, utilities, admin).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And markup is a percentage to the total production cost (e.g. 20\u201350%) to ensure profit. It usually depends on industry standards, retailer requirements, or forecast demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, cost-plus thrives in industries where production costs are clear and products aren\u2019t easily differentiated. <\/strong>Some examples include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Manufacturing,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Retail & distribution,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Construction & contracting,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Food & hospitality, and so on.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
To illustrate, let\u2019s say a contractor is building a custom deck. The expected costs are $6,000 (materials + labor + equipment rental + overhead allocation), and there\u2019s a 20% markup. This means:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- $6,000 + ($6,000 x 0.20) = $6,000 + $1,200 = $7,200<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
While this strategy is very \u201crational\u201d on the surface, there\u2019s a psychological angle too. It creates a feeling of fairness and transparency, which can reduce internal pushback and help justify prices to stakeholders<\/a>, clients, or procurement teams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Overall, cost-plus is easy to use and understand, but it also has some limitations \u2014 namely:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Neglecting customer value<\/strong> \u2014 You set prices based on your cost, not what customers are willing to pay.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Risky in industries with volatile costs<\/strong> \u2014 If ingredients or supply prices swing, the constant price adjustments become tedious and confuse customers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
To conclude, cost-plus is safest in stable industries but can be a liability in competitive, customer-driven markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
#2 Competitive pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Competitive pricing means you determine your price primarily based on what your competitors are charging, hence the alternative terms competition- or market-based pricing.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
You can look at it like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Competitor Price \u00b1 Adjustment = Price<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The adjustment depends on your strategic intent, i.e.:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Price below competitors <\/strong>\u2014 to attract cost-sensitive customers,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Price at parity<\/strong> \u2014 to fit into market expectations, or<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Price above competitors <\/strong>\u2014 to signal higher quality or value.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Let\u2019s use an example \u2014 a new mobile phone accessory brand launching wireless headphones. This brand researches their top 3 competitors and learns their prices for the same kind of product are as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Competitor A: $28.99,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Competitor B: $31.50, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Competitor C: $29.99.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The average competitor price, then, is the sum of those prices divided by 3, which equals $30.16. Depending on what the business in our example wants to accomplish, they could choose:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Lower-than-market positioning: $27.99,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Parity pricing: $29.99, or<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Premium positioning: $32.00.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This kind of approach is most effective in markets where customers can compare prices instantly <\/strong>and where switching costs are low<\/strong> \u2014 for instance:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Retail & e-commerce,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Customer electronics,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Airline & travel,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Telecom, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Although it looks purely market-driven, competitive pricing also has psychological power \u2014 anchoring to the \u201cexpected\u201d price and increasing customers\u2019 trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All in all, this approach is simple to apply since competitors\u2019 prices are typically shared publicly, so you can easily analyze them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the other hand, competitive pricing also has cons such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Ignoring customer value<\/strong> \u2014 You base prices on competitors, not the value you<\/em> deliver.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Potentially causing price wars<\/strong> \u2014 If everyone keeps undercutting, no one wins.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Hindering differentiation <\/strong>\u2014 It\u2019s harder to communicate why your product is better.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
#3 Value-based pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Value-based pricing is a strategy where you set the price based on the customer\u2019s perceived value of the product<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s no universal formula to follow here. Instead, this approach requires a deep understanding of how your target audience benefits from your solution and how it translates into economic or emotional value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, value-based pricing shines where innovation and high-impact outcomes<\/strong> matter, e.g.:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- SaaS and digital products,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Professional services & consulting,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Luxury goods,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Art & collectibles etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
I can provide an example \u2014 a SaaS tool for financial management with 3 tiers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Basic, $15\/user\/month<\/strong> \u2014 It offers basic features, mostly used by freelancers. The tool saves them about 5 hours\/month. If their hourly rate is $25, that\u2019s $125 saved, so paying $15 feels like a bargain.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Team, $49\/user\/month<\/strong> \u2014 It has everything in Basic plus team collaboration features. The app saves cca 12\u201315 hours\/person\/month thanks to the shared boards and communication tools. At $30\/hour, that\u2019s at least $360 saved, so the price of $49 fits the perceived value.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Enterprise, $79\/user\/month <\/strong>\u2014 It has everything in Team plus automations and enhanced security, both crucial for large companies. With the tool saving 30 hours\/person\/month, at $50\/user\/month, that\u2019s $1,500 saved. Charging $79 reflects that higher value.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This strategy appeals to both financial outcomes (ROI) and emotional outcomes (confidence, convenience, prestige).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As for the drawbacks of value-based pricing, you should consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Time-intensive research <\/strong>\u2014 It takes time to organize interviews, surveys, and detailed customer discovery and then use the insights.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Quantifying value <\/strong>\u2014 It can be difficult to quantify the value since some products deliver intangible or long-term outcomes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Potential price inconsistency<\/strong> \u2014 Perceptions of value may change over time, and different customers perceive value differently. This makes standardization tricky.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
#4 Dynamic pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Dynamic pricing is used when prices continuously change based on real-time supply, demand, market conditions, or similar segments.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In other words, there\u2019s no single fixed price \u2014 you adjust it automatically or manually to fill capacity or react to market shifts. That\u2019s why this strategy is also known as demand-based or surge pricing.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s no single formula to rely on. Instead, you take these elements into account:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Demand levels<\/strong> \u2014 High demand means higher prices, while low demand drives discounts or promotions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Supply & availability <\/strong>\u2014 Limited stock\/seats raise prices, whereas surplus inventory triggers markdowns.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Timing & seasonality<\/strong> \u2014 Prices can fluctuate depending on the time of day, day of week, holidays, or season changes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- External conditions<\/strong> \u2014 Certain events, economic factors, or even weather can increase or decrease demand for a product\/service.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Dynamic pricing can maximize revenue and optimize inventory\/capacity. That\u2019s why it\u2019s commonly used in industries such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Airlines & hotels,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Ride-sharing,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Event ticketing (e.g., entertainment, sports)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Logistics & delivery, and so on.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
We can use a simple ride-sharing scenario as an example. It\u2019s rush hour, so the demand spikes, and only 60% of drivers are online. If the base fare is $10, the demand multiplier could be 2.0x due to the high demand and low driver availability. The final price is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- $10 x 2.0 = $20<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Later in the evening, the demand drops and supply increases, so the demand multiplier is now 0.8x. Therefore, the final price is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- $10 x 0.8 = $8<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The psychological factors at play are urgency (\u201cbuy now before it gets worse\u201d<\/em>) and fairness perception (people tend to accept higher prices if they understand demand is high).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That said, the cons of dynamic pricing are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Customer frustration<\/strong> \u2014 Sudden spikes can feel unfair or exploitative.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Maintenance complexity<\/strong> \u2014 Surge pricing requires data, automation, and constant monitoring, so it\u2019s challenging to execute properly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
#5 Penetration pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Penetration pricing means setting a very low launch price to quickly attract customers. <\/strong>Once the product gains traction, the price is gradually increased<\/strong> to a sustainable or profitable level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You can think of penetration pricing like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Market Average Price \u2212 Significant Discount % = Price<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The discount is often 20\u201370%, depending on how aggressively you want to enter the market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now, an example: imagine a company is selling an email marketing tool. Their main competitor offers a similar product at $29\/month, and the said company sets the launch price of $9\/month (70% down).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Also, let\u2019s say the company has the goal of gaining 5,000 users quickly, meaning a total monthly revenue of $45,000. After reaching that, the company sustainably increases the price to $19\/month.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Admittedly, there can be a drop in the number of users after the price increase.<\/strong> But, even if our example company had a 16% churn rate (4,200 retained users), the monthly revenue would be $78,800.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you\u2019re wondering why this works \u2014 customers like the \u201ctoo good to pass up\u201d<\/em> deal effect. And, once they get used to the product\/service in question, they don\u2019t want to lose it even if the price rises later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To sum up, penetration pricing yields benefits such as boosting brand awareness and accelerating market growth. So, it\u2019s popular among new businesses or established companies <\/strong>launching a new product<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In terms of downsides, this strategy can lead to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Risk of devaluing the brand<\/strong> \u2014 If the initial price is too low, it may signal \u201ccheap\u201d instead of \u201cnew.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Overly low margins in early stages <\/strong>\u2014 This is very risky for companies with tight budgets or high production costs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
#6 Price skimming<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Price skimming means launching a product at a very high price to attract early adopters willing to pay a premium<\/strong>. Over time, the price is gradually lowered<\/strong> to attract broader, more price-sensitive customers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s no universal formula, but you do need to think about these key inputs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Market research on early adopters,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Competitor pricing gaps,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- The product\u2019s uniqueness, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Timing for phased price reductions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Price skimming can be highly profitable for innovative products, especially early in the lifecycle.<\/strong> Moreover, this strategy rests on psychological triggers related to status, novelty, and exclusivity, which attract certain buyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Given all that, we can often see price skimming in industries such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Tech hardware & gadgets,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Consumer electronics,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Luxury products & fashion,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Pharmaceuticals & medical devices, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
A typical example would be a smartphone launch. In the earliest launch phase, the high price of $1,099 and 100,000 units sold generate a revenue of $109.9 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Then, in the second phase, the price is $899 with 250,000 units sold, which means a revenue of $224.7 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Finally, late adopters join the bandwagon when the price is lowered to $699, and the company sells another 400,000 units, resulting in revenue worth $279.6 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, the total revenue across the full lifecycle would be $614.2 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, despite its profitability, price skimming can backfire if executed poorly or used in the wrong market conditions. Potential disadvantages include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Alienating price-sensitive buyers early on<\/strong> \u2014 Many will wait months to buy or never buy at all.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Risk of low initial sales volume <\/strong>\u2014 Fewer people can afford the launch price.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Inviting competitors<\/strong> \u2014 Rivals can release lower-priced alternatives, causing you to lose customers.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Possibility of backlash<\/strong> \u2014 Customers may feel cheated if early high prices drop too quickly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
#7 Economy pricing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Economy pricing is a strategy where a business keeps costs extremely low<\/strong> and offers products with minimal frills<\/strong>. The goal is to achieve high sales volumes, maintaining profit even with thin margins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here\u2019s the base formula:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Production Cost + Minimal Markup = Price<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Companies often aim for margins as low as 5\u201310%. This immediately attracts shoppers who prioritize affordability<\/strong>. Plus, the more units are produced, the lower per-unit cost becomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Therefore, economy pricing works best in industries where products are standardized <\/strong>and competition is high<\/strong> \u2014 for instance:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Retail (store brands, generics),<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Food & beverage,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Pharmaceutical generics,<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Ultra-low-cost carriers, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
We can use a generic cereal brand as an example. Supposing the production cost per box is $0.80, and packing and distribution require $0.20, the total cost is $1.00. With a 10% markup, the final price is $1.10 per box.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Compared to a premium competitor selling cereal for, let\u2019s say, $4.50, the economy brand wins through volume and low overhead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The psychological angle here relies on consumer mental shortcuts around value. Many assume the low-price option works fine if they don\u2019t need premium features, and by buying cheap, they avoid the risk of \u201coverpaying.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Still, economy pricing comes with some risks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Extremely low margins<\/strong> \u2014 Small cost increases (e.g., raw materials, logistics) can wipe out profit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Weak brand perception<\/strong> \u2014 Customers may associate low price with low quality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- High reliance on scale <\/strong>\u2014 If you have a low sales volume, failure is practically inevitable due to the tiny margin.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Pros & cons of different pricing strategies \u2014 overview<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Here\u2019s a quick overview of the strengths and weaknesses of all the pricing techniques explained in this article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- Weak brand perception<\/strong> \u2014 Customers may associate low price with low quality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Extremely low margins<\/strong> \u2014 Small cost increases (e.g., raw materials, logistics) can wipe out profit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Risk of low initial sales volume <\/strong>\u2014 Fewer people can afford the launch price.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Alienating price-sensitive buyers early on<\/strong> \u2014 Many will wait months to buy or never buy at all.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Overly low margins in early stages <\/strong>\u2014 This is very risky for companies with tight budgets or high production costs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Maintenance complexity<\/strong> \u2014 Surge pricing requires data, automation, and constant monitoring, so it\u2019s challenging to execute properly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Customer frustration<\/strong> \u2014 Sudden spikes can feel unfair or exploitative.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- $10 x 0.8 = $8<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- $10 x 2.0 = $20<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Supply & availability <\/strong>\u2014 Limited stock\/seats raise prices, whereas surplus inventory triggers markdowns.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Quantifying value <\/strong>\u2014 It can be difficult to quantify the value since some products deliver intangible or long-term outcomes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Team, $49\/user\/month<\/strong> \u2014 It has everything in Basic plus team collaboration features. The app saves cca 12\u201315 hours\/person\/month thanks to the shared boards and communication tools. At $30\/hour, that\u2019s at least $360 saved, so the price of $49 fits the perceived value.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Basic, $15\/user\/month<\/strong> \u2014 It offers basic features, mostly used by freelancers. The tool saves them about 5 hours\/month. If their hourly rate is $25, that\u2019s $125 saved, so paying $15 feels like a bargain.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Potentially causing price wars<\/strong> \u2014 If everyone keeps undercutting, no one wins.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Ignoring customer value<\/strong> \u2014 You base prices on competitors, not the value you<\/em> deliver.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Price at parity<\/strong> \u2014 to fit into market expectations, or<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Risky in industries with volatile costs<\/strong> \u2014 If ingredients or supply prices swing, the constant price adjustments become tedious and confuse customers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Neglecting customer value<\/strong> \u2014 You set prices based on your cost, not what customers are willing to pay.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- $6,000 + ($6,000 x 0.20) = $6,000 + $1,200 = $7,200<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- How does our price compare to competitors?<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- What is the real value we\u2019re offering?<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
![\"Jason](\"https:\/\/plaky.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/Jason-Vaught.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Will](\"https:\/\/plaky.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/Will-Yang.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Anna](\"https:\/\/plaky.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/Anna-Stella.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n![\"Board](\"https:\/\/plaky.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/Plaky-helps-you-track-whatever-matters-1-1110x650.png\")